Blade Runner: The Final Cut (2-Disc Special Edition) [1982]

Amazon.co.uk Review

To call this cut of Blade Runner `long awaited' would be a heavy, heavy understatement. It's taken 25 years since the first release of one of the science-fiction genre's flagship films to get this far, and understandably, Blade Runner: The Final Cut has proved to be one of the most eagerly awaited DVD releases of all time.

And it's been well worth the wait. Director Ridley Scott's decision to head back to the edit suite and cut together one last version of his flat-out classic film has been heavily rewarded, with a genuinely definitive version of an iconic, visually stunning and downright intelligent piece of cinema. Make no mistake: this is by distance the best version of Blade Runner. And it's never looked better, either.

The core of Blade Runner, of course, remains the same, with Harrison Ford's Deckard (the Blade Runner of the title) on the trail of four `replicants', cloned humans that are now illegal. And he does so across an amazing cityscape that's proven to be well ahead of its time, with astounding visuals that defied the supposed limits of special effects back in 1982.

Backed up with a staggering extra features package that varies depending on which version of this Blade Runner release you opt for (two-, four- and five-disc versions are available), the highlight nonetheless remains the stunning film itself. Remastered and restored, it remains a testament to a number of creative people whose thinking was simply a country mile in advance of that of their contemporaries. An unmissable purchase. --Jon Foster

Customer Reviews:

Futuristic Vision Restored!.......2008-02-17

The digital restoration and re-editing of this sci-fi classic was long overdue. Ridley Scott now has the film he always wanted. This new version is, for me, the best now available. It's even more visually stunning, with lots more detail, and benefits from a crisper and less intrusive soundtrack. The generous extras are also informative, particularly the lengthy documentary 'Dangerous Days' on the bonus disc. There is also a 5-disc version available, but this 2-disc release should be enough for most fans. Gratitude to Ridley Scott for revisiting one of his finest films - highly recommended.

At last!.......2008-01-30

Unlike a few of these reviews, I'm writing this after actually seeing the Final Cut 2 disc DVD.

I won't say too much about the film itself. The "Final Cut" is basically the Directors Cut (i.e. no voiceover) plus tweaked special effects and a few minor changes (it's been some time since I've seen the Directors Cut, so I can't give precise details, but it didn't seem drastically different) And "yes", the unicorn scene is there and the "happy" ending is missing.

The picture quality is probably as good as could be expected for a film of this age. Perhaps not quite as sharp as a modern release and some black levels are very slightly off, but overall a good picture, with no noticable dirt, scratches or grain.

The 5.1 mix is particularly impressive. Vangelis' soundtrack fills the room. There are also some nice ambient effects of rain etc, plus the rocket ships have real oomph and zoom from left to right speaker.

The documentary is also worthwhile (not the usual promotional stuff) and is certainly something you can watch more than once.

Overall, a classic film, with good picture, extras and very good sound.

Unless you're a sci-fi geek or completist, I'd opt for the 2 disc edition, rather than the 5 disc.

Probably the only version of Blade Runner you'll ever need to see.......2008-01-22

By now, most viewers will be fairly familiar with Blade Runner (1982) in some capacity. For example, I'm sure anyone with a passing interest in film has already seen it, if not on video then most probably on late night television or the initial "director's cut" edition from 1991. This new "final cut" attempts to clean up some of the flaws and errors that director Ridley Scott was unable to fix at the time of that last particular revision; finally giving us the film as it was always meant to be seen in shimmering anamorphic widescreen; with a pristine image backed by a beautifully mixed soundtrack and all the embarrassing little schoolboy errors touched up with the magic of CGI.

The actual plotline remains almost identical to that of the aforementioned "director's cut"; with the voice over gone and the more open-ended climax present and correct. I thought Scott might have perhaps been a little more radical and mixed in a few of the alternative takes from the legendary work-print version, but no; this is his idea of what Blade Runner is, was, and always should be... and I'm sure most die-hard fans, and indeed, casual viewers, will find little here to complain about. At a first glance the plot seems fairly routine; a loose re-working of the Phillip K. Dick novella, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, in which a grizzled bounty hunter Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) tracks down and terminates rogue androids (here known as replicants) who might pose a threat to the status quo of this dark and dank dystopian future world. Scott adds a sense of further cinematic depth to the story by juxtaposing the science-fiction elements of the plot with the conventions of film noir in a way that was very much revolutionary back in 1983, having only really been seen on a much smaller scale with the Jean Luc Godard film Alphaville (1964).

It is in part his depiction of the world of Blade Runner that gives the film much of its power and mystique, as Scott envisions a world of densely populated, multi-cultural, consumerist drones lost in a maze of looming skyscrapers, neon strip-lights, darkness and torrential rain; all of which is perfectly realised by his team of highly skilled production designers, art directors, set-decorators and craftsmen. The cinematography too was radical for the time in which the film was created, with Scott building on his background in TV commercials and the work that he had done on his first sci-fi masterpiece Alien (1979) to create a look that is continually dark, dank, distressed and decaying; finding beauty in the most bizarre places and capturing a sense of lonesome claustrophobia that became a staple of subsequent films, commercials and music videos for the next twenty-five years.

The film looks better than ever here, with the re-mastered picture and sound quality and the very subtle use of CGI to clear up things like out-of-sync dialog, support wires on the spinners and the obvious stunt-double for Joanna Cassidy's character Zhora; all helping to maintain the endless feeling of plausibility that the world of Blade Runner presents. Admittedly some fans have complained about Scott changing the glorious shot of the dove being released into the bright blue sky for a more suitable shot of cloudy dusk, but I suppose it does make more sense in maintaining the dark world in which the film unfolds. The only new addition that seemed slightly strange to me was in clearing up the original confusion as to how many replicants were actually missing. Much of the film's mystique revolves around the central question as to whether or not Deckard is, in fact, a replicant; a theory that initially came about due to a dubbing error during Deckard's briefing with Captain Bryant. Given that Scott has been one of the most vocal supporters of this theory, it seems odd to me that he would correct this line of dialog in such a way that destroys any real mystery surrounding the "Deckard as replicant" debate.

Whether or not you buy into the Deckard/replicant theory is secondary to the exotic atmosphere created by Scott and his production team, or the central narrative paradox presented by the replicant characters, in particular, Roy Batty (Rutger Hauer). The crux of Blade Runner deals very much with the idea of a synthetic human being more human than the humans themselves; with much of Blade Runner focusing on Batty and his gang of robots in arms trying to prolong their limited lifespan by any means necessary. Once again, Blade Runner is radical in the sense that it gives us a villain that is very much exciting, charismatic, and empathetic in their pursuit of life, and in direct comparison to our supposed hero Deckard, who seems bored, tired and completely lost against the sheer strength and intellectual menace of the iconic Batty.

This isn't a film that everyone will adore; without question it has its flaws like any other film, but regardless, remains a visually impressive and endlessly beguiling science-fiction, mystery noir (and more so than ever on this re-mastered, special edition DVD). Others have already explored the wider aspects of the package itself, pointing out how the five-disk box-set is very much for the die-hard obsessive's, while the two-disk set would appeal more to the casual fan who loves the film and wants the version closest to Ridley Scott's original vision. Without question, Blade Runner is a significant work of science-fiction cinema that manages to overcome any such flaws in character or narrative to take us on a trip into a world far beyond anything we've ever seen before.

Genre defining sci-fi ..... given ANOTHER cut.......2007-12-29

Did we really need this? How many times has this been re-released? I suppose fans of this genre defining sci-fi classic would argue that to much is never enough where Blade Runner is concerned.

So what do we get in this update? In terms of additional content I didn't spot a single thing in the film that I hadn't seen from previous versions. I think there are some slight additions/changes in there but they are minimal. That's a good thing because it wasn't broken & it didn't need fixing. There's a foreword from Ridley Scott but it only lasts about 30 seconds making it the most pointless foreword ever! Why did he bother? Apparently the picture quality has been improved. I didn't feel things looked particularly improved from previous DVD versions (remastered directors cut DVD, incept date: October 2006) so I'm guessing that HD/Blue Ray viewers are going to get the best out of these improvements.

For this 2 disc edition you also get the brilliant 'Dangerous Days' documentary about the making of Blade Runner. This is an incredibly detailed analysis of the film making process, from initial idea, script drafts through casting & the realisation of the director's vision to actual filming. It's a fantastic documentary for fans of Blade Runner & film making itself. But I was disappointed that there wasn't a chapter dedicated to the films seminal Vangelis soundtrack as this is without doubt as important to the film as the visual impact, not to mention one of the best & most original film scores ever. It would have been nice to see how Vangelis got involved & how the soundtrack was realised.

There are also commentaries for the crew & cast, which seem almost a standard feature of DVD content these days but in this case will hold strong interest from die hard fans of the film. I must admit though, even though I'm a huge fan of the film & couldn't really be bothered going through this section of the disc.

As for the film itself? Well, what is left to say about Blade Runner? It's widely regarded as one of the best examples of the sci-fi genre & is nothing less than genre defining, spawning countless imitators & inspirations not just in other science fiction films but also in cinematography, special FX, lighting etc. When you watch the 'Dangerous Days' documentary you realise how much work is involved & how close a project this big comes to not being completed at all. This only makes the films achievement that bit more remarkable.

The story itself is a fairly simple one & the themes involved are open to interpretation. It's not hard to see how the audiences & critics were split on the films release. Whatever you think of the film nobody can deny that it is & always will be one of the best, if not the best, example of the science fiction genre as well as a masterpiece of modern cinema & film making.

Blade Runner 5/5 - A masterpiece of the genre & modern cinema
Final Cut - 2 disc DVD edition 3/5 - Excellent documentary but other new additions somewhat lacking.

The best version of an over-rated film.......2007-12-28

I first saw the director's cut about ten years ago, and I have since seen it about another four times. I never hated the film, although I did dislike it. I enjoyed the new Final Cut more than I expected and I am inclined to think that the film is okay, but seriously over-rated. I know someone who thinks it's their favourite film of all time. I just can't see what he sees in it.

My problems with it are all to do with the story. The film comes at you as though through a dense fog. There's something detached about it that isn't good for involving you in it's tiny little story. It has a start and an end, but doesn't really have much of a middle. It's slow, ponderous and aimless until suddenly Deckard kills Zora the stripper.

I like the Sean Young storyline. If anything that's probably the best thing about the film, but it's also rather facile; has a tossed off quality about it, as though all this talking was boring the director. The actors generate zero heat between themselves, but their withdrawn dullness does give off a strange cool vibe that works well with the film's overall tone.

I'm not frame by frame, shot by shot, familiar with the film so the alterations in this new Final Cut are invisible to me. As far as I could tell it was the director's cut I was watching. Nothing pops out and announces itself to you as being a new addition. Some mistakes have been removed and I did notice their removal but otherwise it was the same film I've always known. If you've been waiting 15 years for this new super cut of the film then you might feel annoyed?

I've never seen the original 1982 Cinema Cut so I've never been confused on the question of Deckard's humanity. There is no other way to read the information presented to you by the unicorn dream, Olmos' dialogue at the end, and the origami figure left on the doorstep. Deckard has to be a replicant. I am 100% sure of that. The friend I mentioned earlier who loves the film used to think Deckard was human until I explained to him how the information isn't ambiguous. Film makers don't just put rural unicorn dreams into dystopian futuristic sci-fi films without a reason. He watched it again and agreed with me that he probably is a replicant.

The documentary on disc 2 is very long (three and a half hours) and is very detailed on the practical side of film making. Unfortunately it doesn't have much about the thematic stuff. BBC film critic Mark Kermode made a 50 minute documentary a few years ago and it was much more detailed about what the film is about, and what it's saying. Rutger Hauer said some interesting things in it; like how Harrison Ford should not have made the movie as it's a poor leading man role ("He bangs a washing machine" I think was what he said about Deckard). Also they tackled the replicant issue head on and Ridley Scott stated for a fact that Deckard is a replicant.

This is a bit left field but if you love Blade Runner then I recommend that you see Click starring Adam Sandler. The film takes a weird turn after the first half hour of sentimental comedy and turns into a depressing hardcore sci-fi movie! If you like your sci-fi concepts to be bleak, and questioning of the human condition, then it's worth a look as it covers similar themes about what a human life really is, how important memories are etc. It's not a good film, just very reminiscent of Blade Runner.

DVD:

DVD List

DVD